Git hosting

We put 6 git hosting tools through the same test. GitHub came out on top with 5 out of 5. Here are all the results, what each tool costs and how we test them.

6 tools testedTop score 5/5Updated November 4, 2026
Reviews

Git hosting we tested

Best score first. Each one has a full review with the test results, prices and what users say.

1

GitHub

5/5Read our review →
2

Bitbucket

4.5/5Read our review →
3

GitLab

4.5/5Read our review →
4

Azure DevOps

4/5Read our review →
5

Gitea

3/5Read our review →
6

Codeberg

2/5Read our review →
Side by side

Test results compared

Every tool got the same test, between October 15, 2026 to October 28, 2026.

ToolScoreTime to first successful result following the docsPerformance: latency, success rate or tasks passedDocumentation and SDK qualityLimits and lock-in (export, open standards)Cost at small, medium and large usage
GitHub5/513 min to first successful result19/20 CI/review checks passing10/10 documentation checks; 5/5 setup examples work5/5 export/open-format checks; 0 manual migrations–
Bitbucket4.5/525 min to first successful result20/20 CI/review checks passing9/10 documentation checks; 5/5 setup examples work5/5 export/open-format checks; 0 manual migrations–
GitLab4.5/527 min to first successful result19/20 CI/review checks passing9/10 documentation checks; 5/5 setup examples work5/5 export/open-format checks; 0 manual migrations–
Azure DevOps4/538 min to first successful result19/20 CI/review checks passing9/10 documentation checks; 4/5 setup examples work4/5 export/open-format checks; 1 manual migrations–
Gitea3/557 min to first successful result14/20 CI/review checks passing7/10 documentation checks; 4/5 setup examples work3/5 export/open-format checks; 2 manual migrations–
Codeberg2/591 min to first successful result10/20 CI/review checks passing5/10 documentation checks; 3/5 setup examples work2/5 export/open-format checks; 3 manual migrations–
Best of 2026

Want just the shortlist?

Our best-of list ranks every tool in this test, with what each one is best for.

See the best git hosting →
The basics

What git hosting do

Git hosting services store Git repositories online and add pull requests, issue tracking, access control and usually CI/CD. Some are hosted SaaS, some are self-hosted software with an optional paid cloud or support tier, and several now bundle AI coding agents.

Who uses them: Software teams of any size, Companies already on Atlassian or Microsoft stacks, Privacy-focused or regulated organisations that must self-host, Solo developers and students.

Price range: Every tool has a free route. Paid per-user seats range from 3.65 USD (Bitbucket Standard) to 29 USD a month billed annually (GitLab Premium); GitHub Team 4, Azure DevOps Basic 6 after 5 free users, GitHub Enterprise 21. Gitea is free to self-host with Enterprise at 9.5 to 19 USD per user. Codeberg has no paid plans. AI add-ons are extra, for example Copilot Pro 10 USD and Business 19 USD per seat.

What to check before you buy

Free plan limits. GitHub free gives unlimited private repos and 2,000 Actions minutes; GitLab Free caps private top-level groups at 5 users and 400 minutes; Bitbucket Free caps at 5 users and 50 minutes; Azure DevOps gives 5 free Basic users.

Per-seat price. Paid entry runs from 3.65 USD (Bitbucket Standard) and 4 USD (GitHub Team) to 6 USD (Azure DevOps Basic) and 29 USD (GitLab Premium, billed annually).

CI/CD quota and cost. Included minutes vary 50 to 50,000 a month; GitHub cut hosted runner prices in 2026 and postponed a self-hosted runner fee.

Ecosystem and community. GitHub has about 150 million users.

Self-hosting option. Gitea (MIT) and GitLab self-managed can run on your servers; Codeberg runs Forgejo as a non-profit; GitHub, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps are mainly cloud.

How we test

How we test git hosting

The test for this category: Host the same repository with CI; pipeline speed, code review, limits on free and team plans.

Each tool is used to build the same small reference app or integration from the docs (for example a to-do API with auth, a site search over 10,000 products, a scraper for 1,000 pages). AI coding assistants get the same 20 coding tasks in a sample repository.

Each tool is tested on a paid plan, and its review shows the plan, the price and the test dates. The overall score is the average of the five parts on the right, rounded to the nearest half star. See the full method for developer platforms and APIs tools.

What we measure

  • Time to first successful result following the docs
  • Performance: latency, success rate or tasks passed
  • Documentation and SDK quality
  • Limits and lock-in (export, open standards)
  • Cost at small, medium and large usage

The five parts of the score

PerformanceDeveloper experienceFeaturesReliabilityValue for money

Frequently asked questions

What is the best Git hosting service?

GitHub for ecosystem, GitLab for all-in-one DevSecOps, Bitbucket for Jira users, Gitea or Codeberg for self-hosting or non-profit hosting.

Is Git hosting free?

All six have a free route; limits differ (GitLab and Bitbucket cap free teams at 5 users).

What is the difference between Git and GitHub?

Git is the version control tool; GitHub is a hosting service built on it.

Can I self-host?

Gitea and GitLab self-managed can be self-hosted; Codeberg runs Forgejo as a hosted non-profit.

Is GitHub cheaper than GitLab?

Team is 4 USD against GitLab Premium at 29 USD billed annually; feature sets differ.

Related

More in developer tools

Page updated November 4, 2026.

Photo of Jason Kim
Written by

Jason Kim

Software performance and web applications

I've never been impressed by software simply because it looks modern. I'm far more interested in what happens when you actually start using the platform.

Disagree, or want your company reviewed?

Make your case

Think we got a review wrong?

If you use a tool we reviewed, or work for the company, email us with what you saw. We'll look at the evidence and update the review if it changes our findings.

Want your company reviewed?

Send us your product, website and the category it fits. We'll test it the same way as every other tool. It's free, and we can't promise a date or a score.

review.now.team@gmail.com Subject: Correction: [page] or Review request: [product]
Disagree, or want a review? Make your case →