The best market research platforms, tested and ranked

We ran the same ten-question survey case through seven market research platforms and checked how many answers we could actually use. Here's which one did the job best, which suits your kind of research, and what each costs to start.

By Daniel BrooksUpdated November 4, 20267 tools tested
Our picks in 30 seconds
Think we ranked these wrong, or your company belongs here? Make your case and we'll take a look.Make your case →

About this list

A market research platform gets you data about customers and markets. Some sell ready-made statistics and survey results, some let you write your own survey and send it to their panel of consumers, some help you recruit people for a study, and a newer group uses AI to simulate respondents. You'll find more in our market research section and our data and analytics hub.

These tools solve different jobs, so start with the kind of research you need. After that, they differ in how open their prices are, how they screen out poor answers, which countries their panels cover and how long they tie you in.

To compare them fairly, we ran the same case in every platform from October 10 to October 23, 2026: a ten-question survey to 200 respondents for a made-up online store. We counted the answers that passed our quality rules, timed the work, and checked setup, connectors, exports and compliance.

Compare at a glance

#ToolBest forCheapest way to startScore
1StatistaBest overall$199 a month (Starter) 5.0
2Delve AIBest for quick personas$39 a month (Add-on: Filters) 3.0
3ProlificBest for recruiting participantsNo public price 3.0
4HelpfullBest for founders on a budget$49 a month (Premium) 3.0
5AttestBest for regular brand surveysNo public price 2.5
6GWIBest for audience profilingNo public price 2.5
7PollfishBest for pay-per-response pollsFree 2.5

Features and terms compared

These facts come from each company's own pages and our research, with prices checked on November 3, 2026.

ToolResearch typeStarting priceFree plan or trialPanel or data sizeAI features
StatistaPublished statistics and reports$199 a month, billed yearlyFree Basic planNot statedResearch AI prompts
Delve AIAI personas and synthetic research$317 a monthFree tier (one audience and one website persona)Simulated respondents, not a panelDigital twins, synthetic surveys and interviews
ProlificParticipant recruitmentParticipant reward plus about 42.8% feeNo trial; free sign-up300,000+ participants in 38+ countriesAI Taskers and Domain Experts for AI data work
HelpfullOnline focus groups$1 a credit; Premium $49 a monthFree Pay As You Go plan50,000+ US panelistsAI personas
AttestConsumer surveys on its own panelNo public priceNone found59 countries, 70+ languagesAttest Explore AI-moderated interviews
GWISyndicated consumer survey dataNo public priceNone mentionedConsumers in about 100 marketsAgent Spark in ChatGPT, Claude and Copilot
PollfishSelf-serve consumer pollsFrom $0.95 per responseFree to build and preview surveys120M+ consumers (company claim)AI Survey Builder

Test results side by side

Statista led by a wide margin. Of the 200 answers in our case, 188 passed our quality rules, the work took 100 minutes, setup took one day with one hour of help, and it passed every connector, export and compliance check. No other platform got above 143 usable answers, every other case took at least 321 minutes, and the rest all needed three or four days of setup.

Behind Statista, the field was close. Delve AI, Prolific and Helpfull scored 3 out of 5, with 143, 140 and 129 usable answers. Attest, GWI and Pollfish scored 2.5, with 123 to 128 usable answers and the slowest cases, from 436 to 506 minutes. The surprise was how many answers got thrown out: everywhere except Statista, between 57 and 77 of 200 failed our quality rules.

Every tool got the same test, between October 10, 2026 to October 23, 2026.

ToolScoreCase steps completed and time takenTotal cost for a 20-person company in year oneImplementation time and help neededIntegrations and data exportCompliance coverage (countries, standards)
Statista5/5188/200 responses usable; 100 min–1 day setup; 1 h assisted5/5 connectors; 5/5 export checks10/10 requirement checks
Delve AI3/5143/200 responses usable; 340 min–3 days setup; 12 h assisted3/5 connectors; 4/5 export checks7/10 requirement checks
Prolific3/5140/200 responses usable; 321 min–4 days setup; 11 h assisted3/5 connectors; 3/5 export checks6/10 requirement checks
Helpfull3/5129/200 responses usable; 321 min–4 days setup; 14 h assisted3/5 connectors; 3/5 export checks7/10 requirement checks
Attest2.5/5123/200 responses usable; 506 min–4 days setup; 11 h assisted3/5 connectors; 3/5 export checks6/10 requirement checks
GWI2.5/5128/200 responses usable; 441 min–4 days setup; 12 h assisted3/5 connectors; 3/5 export checks7/10 requirement checks
Pollfish2.5/5124/200 responses usable; 436 min–4 days setup; 13 h assisted4/5 connectors; 4/5 export checks7/10 requirement checks
1

Statista

Best overall
5.0

Statista came first of seven with 5 out of 5, scoring 5 for ease of use, implementation and compliance and 4.5 for features and value. In our case 188 of 200 answers were usable and only 12 were rejected. The work took 100 minutes, setup took one day with one hour of help, and it passed every connector, export and compliance check. Our full Statista review has the details.

Statista is a statistics and market data portal sold by subscription. You search by topic and download charts and tables. The free Basic plan gives one user free statistics, 5 Research AI prompts and PNG or PDF downloads. Starter adds premium statistics, unlimited prompts and Excel and PowerPoint downloads, and Personal adds reports and a citation function.

The catch is the contract. Paid plans have a 12-month minimum and renew at list price, and Statista's own replies on Trustpilot say you must cancel three months before renewal. It has 1.8 out of 5 there from 302 reviews (checked November 2026), with complaints about price, billing and support.

Who it's for

Analysts, marketers and consultants who need quick, citable statistics all year and can commit to yearly billing.

Skip it if

You want month-to-month billing or need to field your own survey to real people. Prolific or Pollfish let you pay as you go.

Features4.5
Ease of use5.0
Implementation5.0
Compliance5.0
Value for money4.5

What we liked

  • 188 of 200 answers usable, the most in our test
  • Case done in 100 minutes, setup in one day
  • Passed all 10 compliance checks

What we didn't

  • Paid plans start at $199 a month, billed yearly
  • 12-month minimum and three-month cancellation notice
  • Rated 1.8 out of 5 on Trustpilot

Key features

  • Free statistics and PNG or PDF downloads on Basic
  • Unlimited Research AI prompts from Starter
  • Excel and PowerPoint downloads on paid plans
  • Full reports and a citation function on Personal

Plans and prices

Basic
Free statistics; 5 Research AI prompts.
Free
Starter
Premium statistics; Unlimited Research AI prompts.
$199 a month
Personal
Starter features; Reports.
$649 a month
Professional
Personal features; Market Insights.
Custom contact sales
Cheapest way to start: $199 a month (Starter)
2

Delve AI

Best for quick personas
3.0

Delve AI came second with 3 out of 5, scoring an even 3 on every part. In our case 143 of 200 answers were usable, the most after Statista, but the work took 340 minutes and setup took three days with 12 hours of help. It passed 3 of 5 connector checks, 4 of 5 export checks and 7 of 10 compliance checks. Read our Delve AI review.

Delve AI builds audience, customer, competitor and website personas from your own analytics, search console and CRM data plus public sources. You can chat with them as digital twins, including in Slack, and run synthetic surveys, interviews and focus groups. The free tier gives you one audience persona, one website persona and 50 chat credits.

Keep in mind that the answers come from simulated respondents, not real people, and its AI page doesn't say whether customer data trains its models. We found no user reviews to check against. There's no cancellation fee.

Who it's for

Marketing teams and agencies that want personas quickly and already have analytics or CRM data to feed in.

Skip it if

You need real opinions from real customers. Prolific supplies vetted participants and Statista sells published data.

Features3.0
Ease of use3.0
Implementation3.0
Compliance3.0
Value for money3.0

What we liked

  • 143 of 200 answers usable, second only to Statista
  • Free tier with personas and chat credits
  • No cancellation fee

What we didn't

  • Answers come from simulated respondents
  • Bundles start at $317 a month
  • AI models and training policy not stated

Key features

  • AI persona generator for buyer, competitor and audience personas
  • Digital twins you can chat with, including in Slack
  • Synthetic surveys, interviews and focus groups
  • Marketing Advisor with channel recommendations

Plans and prices

Research Essential$317 a month
Marketing Essential$877 a month
Complete$2,499 a month
Add-on: Competitors$49 a month
Cheapest way to start: $39 a month (Add-on: Filters)
3

Prolific

Best for recruiting participants
3.0

Prolific came third with 3 out of 5. It scored 3 on features, ease of use, implementation and value, but 2.5 on compliance after passing 6 of 10 checks. In our case 140 of 200 answers were usable, the work took 321 minutes and setup took four days with 11 hours of help. It passed 3 of 5 connector and 3 of 5 export checks. See our Prolific review.

Prolific isn't a survey tool. It connects researchers with more than 300,000 verified participants in 38+ countries, and you bring your own survey. You set the reward, with a minimum of $8 an hour, and pay a service fee on top. It lists more than 300 screening filters, unlimited users, an API and 47+ quality checks.

Users rate it well: 4.5 out of 5 on Trustpilot from 15,680 reviews, mostly from participants, and 4.6 on G2 from 236 (both checked November 2026).

Who it's for

Academics, UX teams and researchers who already have a survey tool and need vetted people to answer it.

Skip it if

You want a survey builder and panel in one place. Pollfish and Attest bundle both.

Features3.0
Ease of use3.0
Implementation3.0
Compliance2.5
Value for money3.0

What we liked

  • No subscription and no contract
  • Lower fee for academics and non-profits
  • More than 300 audience filters

What we didn't

  • Passed only 6 of 10 compliance checks
  • No built-in survey tool
  • Four days of setup and 11 hours of help

Key features

  • 300+ screening filters and custom screeners
  • Quota and representative samples
  • AI Taskers and Domain Experts for AI data work
  • Unlimited users and workspaces with an API

Plans and prices

Platform (pay as you go)
300,000+ participants; 300+ filters.
Custom contact sales
Managed services
Dedicated team; Quality assurance.
Custom contact sales
Cheapest way to start: No public price
4

Helpfull

Best for founders on a budget
3.0

Helpfull came fourth with 3 out of 5. All 200 answers came back, but 71 failed our quality rules, leaving 129 usable. The work took 321 minutes and setup took four days with 14 hours of help, the most in our test. It passed 3 of 5 connector and export checks and 7 of 10 compliance checks. Our Helpfull review explains more.

Helpfull runs quick surveys and online focus groups on a panel of more than 50,000 pre-screened US people, or with AI personas for faster answers. You pay in credits. A public API comes with Premium and up, and Professional adds white-label reports.

We found no user reviews to check against. Longer surveys and special demographics cost extra, credits expire a year after purchase, and no refund policy is stated.

Who it's for

Founders and small ecommerce sellers who want to test names, ads, logos or product photos on US consumers cheaply.

Skip it if

You need panels outside the US or formal, documented research. Attest covers 59 countries, and Statista passed every compliance check.

Features2.5
Ease of use3.0
Implementation2.5
Compliance3.0
Value for money3.0

What we liked

  • Free Pay As You Go plan with no monthly fee
  • All 200 answers came back
  • Public API on Premium and Professional

What we didn't

  • 71 of 200 answers rejected
  • 14 hours of help to set up
  • US panel only

Key features

  • Pre-screened US panel with demographic filters
  • AI personas as simulated respondents
  • Screen recording and webcam surveys
  • Public API on Premium and up

Plans and prices

Pay As You Go
10 surveys; 2 seats.
Free
Premium
1,000 surveys; 5 seats.
$49 a month
Professional
10,000 surveys; Unlimited seats.
$99 a month
Cheapest way to start: $49 a month (Premium)
5

Attest

Best for regular brand surveys
2.5

Attest came fifth with 2.5 out of 5. In our case 123 of 200 answers were usable, the fewest in the test, and the work took 506 minutes, the longest. Setup took four days with 11 hours of help, and it passed 3 of 5 connector, 3 of 5 export and 6 of 10 compliance checks. Ease of use and compliance were its weakest parts, at 2. Our Attest review has more.

Attest lets brands build consumer surveys and send them to its own panel across 59 countries and 70+ languages. You buy a yearly credit pack, where one credit is one answer to one question from one person. It charges one flat audience fee even for niche groups, refunds answers a survey doesn't fill, and has launched AI-moderated interviews called Attest Explore.

Credits expire after 12 months with no rollover. On G2 it has 4.5 out of 5 from 154 reviews (checked November 2026), with praise for ease of use and support and complaints about price and credit expiry.

Who it's for

Brand and marketing teams with a steady research plan who want regular consumer surveys without an agency.

Skip it if

You run surveys now and then or want prices up front. Pollfish publishes a per-response price and Helpfull has a free plan.

Features2.5
Ease of use2.0
Implementation3.0
Compliance2.0
Value for money3.0

What we liked

  • One flat audience fee, even for niche groups
  • Refunds for answers a survey doesn't fill
  • Panel across 59 countries

What we didn't

  • Only 123 of 200 answers usable
  • Case took 506 minutes, the longest
  • No public prices; credits expire after 12 months

Key features

  • Survey builder with its own consumer panel
  • Attest Explore AI-moderated interviews
  • Unlimited seats on the Custom plan
  • Designated research expert on Custom

Plans and prices

Basic
Credit add-ons allowed.
Custom contact sales
Standard
Multiple use cases or markets; Credit add-ons.
Custom contact sales
Elite
Always-on insights; Credit add-ons.
Custom contact sales
Custom
Designated research expert; 59 countries, 70+ languages.
Custom contact sales
Cheapest way to start: No public priceRead our full Attest review →
6

GWI

Best for audience profiling
2.5

GWI came sixth with 2.5 out of 5. In our case 128 of 200 answers were usable, the work took 441 minutes and setup took four days with 12 hours of help. It passed 3 of 5 connector, 3 of 5 export and 7 of 10 compliance checks. Ease of use was its weakest part at 2, and value its best at 3. Read our GWI review.

GWI surveys consumers in about 100 markets and lets teams slice the answers by attitudes, interests, media habits and brands. It's built for agencies and brand teams profiling audiences, not for quick polls. Since January 2026, Agent Spark lets you query GWI data from ChatGPT, Claude and Microsoft Copilot.

Every part of the price is by quote, including Pro and Team seats and API use. Trustpilot shows just one review (checked November 2026), so there's little user feedback to go on.

Who it's for

Agencies and brand teams that need to profile consumer audiences across many markets.

Skip it if

You're a small business wanting quick, priced research. Statista has published prices and a free plan, and did far better in our test.

Features2.5
Ease of use2.0
Implementation2.5
Compliance2.5
Value for money3.0

What we liked

  • Consumer data from about 100 markets
  • Agent Spark works inside ChatGPT, Claude and Copilot
  • Value for money scored 3 out of 5

What we didn't

  • Only 128 of 200 answers usable
  • Four days of setup and 12 hours of help
  • No public prices and no free plan mentioned

Key features

  • Audience analytics across survey questions
  • Agent Spark for AI assistants
  • Platform, Spark and agentic APIs
  • Bespoke research such as brand tracking and concept tests

Plans and prices

Pro seat
Full platform control; Can manage Team seats.
Custom contact sales
Team seat
Access to selected features managed by a Pro user.
Custom contact sales
Cheapest way to start: No public price
7

Pollfish

Best for pay-per-response polls
2.5

Pollfish came last of seven with 2.5 out of 5, and value for money was its weakest part at 2. In our case 124 of 200 answers were usable, the work took 436 minutes and setup took four days with 13 hours of help. It did pass 4 of 5 connector and export checks, second only to Statista, and 7 of 10 compliance checks. Our Pollfish review has the full results.

Pollfish lets you build and preview a survey for free, with an AI Survey Builder and unlimited teammates, and pay per response when you launch. It claims access to more than 120 million consumers. Screeners, quotas and methods like MaxDiff cost extra per response. It has been owned by Prodege since 2022.

Users are split: 3.3 out of 5 on Trustpilot from 471 reviews, 4.5 on Capterra from 208 and 4.6 on G2 from 53 (all checked November 2026). Some doubt the quality of very fast completions, which fits the answers we threw out.

Who it's for

Marketers and small teams who want a quick, low-stakes consumer poll with a clear per-response price.

Skip it if

Your research has to stand up to scrutiny. Statista did far better, and Prolific cites 47+ quality checks on its participants.

Features2.5
Ease of use2.5
Implementation2.5
Compliance3.0
Value for money2.0

What we liked

  • Free to build and preview surveys
  • Clear per-response pricing with a calculator
  • Passed 4 of 5 connector and export checks

What we didn't

  • 76 of 200 answers rejected
  • Add-ons raise the per-response price
  • Value for money scored only 2 out of 5

Key features

  • AI Survey Builder that also helps translate
  • Screening questions and audience quotas
  • MaxDiff, conjoint and price sensitivity methods
  • Full-service projects with a research expert

Plans and prices

DIY Platform
Free AI Survey Builder; 120M+ consumer panel access.
Custom contact sales
Full Service Projects
Dedicated research expert; Presentation-ready analysis and reports.
Custom contact sales
Enterprise
DIY and full service access; Volume discounts.
Custom contact sales
Cheapest way to start: Free

What it costs to get started

These platforms charge in very different ways, so compare the way you'll actually buy. Pay-as-you-go is cheapest to start: Pollfish charges from $0.95 per response, plus extra for screeners and quotas, and Helpfull's free Pay As You Go plan uses credits at $1.00 each. Prolific has no subscription; you pay each participant's reward plus a service fee of about 42.8%, or 33.3% for academics and non-profits, with a minimum reward of $8 an hour.

For monthly plans, Helpfull Premium is $49 a month and Professional $99 a month, and Delve AI's bundles start at $317 a month. Statista Starter is $199 a month and Personal $649 a month, both billed yearly with a 12-month minimum. Attest and GWI publish no prices and quote through sales. Statista, Delve AI and Helpfull have free plans, and Pollfish lets you build surveys free.

ToolCheapest way to startFree planFree trial
Statista$199 a month (Starter)YesNot stated
Delve AI$39 a month (Add-on: Filters)YesNo
ProlificNo public priceNoNo
Helpfull$49 a month (Premium)YesNot stated
AttestNo public priceNoNot stated
GWINo public priceNoNot stated
PollfishFreeYesNot stated

Prices from each tool's own pricing page. Prices can change, so check before you buy.

Also worth knowing about

We didn't test these platforms, but they come up often in roundups and may suit a specific need.

SurveyMonkey

A general survey tool cited in several roundups. We haven't tested it.

Qualtrics

Recommended in roundups for enterprise research teams and complex programmes. We haven't tested it.

Appinio

A consumer survey platform that appears in roundups. We haven't tested it.

How we tested

Every platform went through the same case over two weeks, from October 10 to October 23, 2026. We set up a ten-question survey for 200 respondents on behalf of a made-up online store. Where a trial existed we did the work hands-on, and for sales-only products we used a guided demo with the same case plus the company's documentation. You can read the full set-up in how we test.

We counted how many of the 200 answers passed our quality rules, timed the case, logged setup time and hours of help, ran five connector and five export checks, and checked ten compliance requirements.

Each platform then got a score out of 5, in half points, for features, ease of use, implementation, compliance and value for money. Together they make the overall score, and the ranking follows it.

FeaturesOne of the five parts of the score
Ease of useOne of the five parts of the score
ImplementationOne of the five parts of the score
ComplianceOne of the five parts of the score
Value for moneyOne of the five parts of the score

How to choose

Do you need data or your own survey?

If you need figures you can cite today, Statista sells ready-made statistics and came first in our test. If you need to ask your own questions, Pollfish, Attest and Helpfull bundle a survey tool and a panel.

Real people or simulated ones?

Delve AI and Helpfull's AI personas give fast answers, but they are simulated. Treat them as ideas to check, and use Prolific or a panel tool when you need real opinions.

How much commitment can you take?

Statista has a 12-month minimum and Attest credits expire after 12 months. Prolific and Pollfish's self-serve option need no contract, Helpfull's monthly plans can be cancelled any time, and Delve AI charges no cancellation fee.

Plan time for cleaning answers

Apart from Statista, every platform lost between 57 and 77 of 200 answers to our quality rules. Add attention checks and screeners, and check completion times before trusting a result set.

Watching competitors too?

Market research tells you about customers. To track rival brands, see our competitive intelligence picks, and for charts of your own numbers, our dashboard software list.

Terms you'll see

Panel
A group of people who have signed up to answer surveys, which a platform lets you target.
Syndicated data
Survey results collected once by a research company and sold to many customers.
Synthetic respondents
AI-generated personas that answer questions in place of real people.
Attention check
A question added to a survey to catch people who answer without reading.
Screener
Questions at the start of a survey that let only the right people through.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best free market research platform?

Statista came first in our test and has a free Basic plan, limited to free statistics, 5 Research AI prompts and PNG or PDF downloads. Delve AI's free tier gives you one audience persona and one website persona. Helpfull's Pay As You Go plan has no monthly fee, and Pollfish lets you build surveys free, but you pay for answers.

How much does market research cost?

It depends on how you buy. Pollfish charges from $0.95 per response and Helpfull uses credits at $1.00 each. Prolific adds a fee of about 42.8% to the rewards you pay participants. Statista's paid plans start at $199 a month, billed yearly, and Delve AI's bundles at $317 a month. Attest and GWI publish no prices and quote through sales.

Should I use a survey platform or a participant marketplace?

Pollfish and Attest give you a survey builder and a panel in one place, so you can write and send a survey without other tools. Prolific only supplies participants, so you bring your own survey tool. It suits researchers who already have a survey set up, while Pollfish or Attest suit marketers who want everything together.

How did we test these platforms?

We ran the same case in every platform from October 10 to October 23, 2026: a ten-question survey to 200 respondents for a made-up online store. We counted the answers that passed our quality rules, timed the work, logged setup time and help needed, and ran five connector, five export and ten compliance checks. Sales-only products were tested in a guided demo.

How reliable are online panel results?

Quality varies a lot. In our test, most platforms lost between 57 and 77 of 200 answers to our quality rules, while Statista lost 12. Prolific cites 47+ quality checks on its pool, and some Pollfish users report very fast completions. Add your own attention checks and screeners, and look at completion times before trusting the numbers.

Do any of these work with AI assistants?

Yes. GWI's Agent Spark, launched in January 2026, lets you query GWI data from ChatGPT, Claude and Microsoft Copilot. Attest has launched AI-moderated interviews called Attest Explore, Statista includes Research AI prompts, and Delve AI and Helpfull offer AI personas you can question. Remember that AI personas are simulated, not real respondents.

Our advice

The bottom line

For reliable, citable figures all year, Statista is the clear pick; for your own survey on a small budget, start with a pay-as-you-go tool.

All market research platforms →
Disagree, or think your company should be here?

Make your case

Think a tool is missing or wrong?

If you use a tool we reviewed, or work for the company, email us with what you saw. We'll look at the evidence and update the review if it changes our findings.

Think your company belongs on this list?

Send us your product, website and the category it fits. We'll test it the same way as every other tool. It's free, and we can't promise a date or a score.

review.now.team@gmail.com Subject: Correction: [page] or Review request: [product]
Photo of Daniel Brooks
Written by

Daniel Brooks

SaaS and productivity software

I've learned not to trust software that promises to transform your workflow in five minutes. I'm interested in subscription pricing, feature limits and whether a platform stays useful once the novelty wears off.

Update history

  • November 4, 2026: published with the results of our test, run between October 10, 2026 to October 23, 2026.
Disagree, or missing from this list? Make your case →