The best plagiarism checkers, tested and ranked
We ran the same 50 documents, with copied, reworded and original passages we'd labelled in advance, through six plagiarism checkers. Here's which one caught the most, which suits students, teachers or publishers, and what each costs to start.
About this list
A plagiarism checker compares your text with web pages, academic sources and sometimes stored student papers, then highlights the passages that match and gives an overall similarity percentage. Most now include an AI-text detector as well, which gives a probability rather than proof. You'll find more tools like these in our plagiarism checkers section and our writing tools hub.
The big differences are what each tool searches, how it handles reworded text and how you pay. Some search only the public web, while others add academic papers or news archives. Pricing ranges from a few cents per search to a monthly word allowance or a one-off fee per document, so the right pick depends a lot on how often you check. Privacy matters too: some tools keep your documents, and one may use them for AI training unless you opt out.
To compare them fairly, we ran every checker on the same labelled set of 50 documents from October 25 to October 31, 2026. Thirty contained copied or paraphrased passages and 20 were original, and we knew the right answer for each in advance. We counted the documents each tool got right, the original ones it wrongly flagged, the copied ones it missed, and how long each check took.
Compare at a glance
| # | Tool | Best for | Cheapest way to start | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Plagium | Best overall | $19.98 a month (Unlimited) | 3.0 |
| 2 | Quetext | Best for regular checking | $14.99 a month (Essential) | 3.0 |
| 3 | PlagiarismCheck.org | Best for teachers and schools | $5.99 one-time (Basic) | 2.5 |
| 4 | SmallSEOTools | Best for quick free checks | $9.80 a month (Pro Monthly) | 2.5 |
| 5 | Copyscape | Best for publishers checking web copy | Free | 2.0 |
| 6 | Scribbr | Best for a one-off thesis check | $19.95 one-time (Small document) | 2.0 |
Features and terms compared
These facts come from each company's own pages and our research, with prices checked on November 3, 2026; Scribbr's prices come from third-party listings.
| Tool | Free tier | Cheapest way to pay | Pricing model | AI detector | Integrations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plagium | 2 searches a day, up to 2,000 characters each | $2 per document (1 to 5 pages) | Per document, credits or monthly | Yes, uses credits | LMS on the Institutional plan |
| Quetext | 1,000 words per tool | Essential, $14.99 a month | Monthly word allowance | Yes, on every plan | Google Workspace add-on, API |
| PlagiarismCheck.org | One 2-page check | Basic pack, $5.99 (billing not stated) | Packs; school plans by quote | Yes, TraceGPT | Moodle, Canvas, Google Classroom and more |
| SmallSEOTools | 1,000 words per scan | Pro Monthly, $9.80 a month | Monthly or yearly subscription | Not stated | WordPress plugin |
| Copyscape | URL search, up to 10 results | 3 cents per search of up to 200 words | Prepaid credits per search | Yes, on Premium | API, WordPress |
| Scribbr | No free full report | $19.95 one-time, up to 7,499 words | Per document, no subscription | Yes, with a paid check | None listed |
Test results side by side
No checker was close to perfect, and the scores show it: the top two got 3 out of 5 and the bottom two 2. Quetext got the most documents right, 41 of 50, and missed the fewest copies, 6 of 30. Plagium was just behind on 40 of 50 and missed 7, but it was the quickest at 21.7 seconds per document and tied Quetext for the fewest false alarms, wrongly flagging 3 of our 20 original documents. Its higher scores for speed and for false positives outweighed Quetext's edge on accuracy, and it ranked first.
Every other checker wrongly flagged 4 of the 20 originals and missed between 8 and 10 of the 30 copies. Scribbr missed the most, 10, and was the slowest at 29.9 seconds per document. The surprise was how little price told us: Scribbr, the most expensive per document, came last, while Plagium, which you can use free each day, came first. In practice, even the best tool here missed about one copied document in five, so treat a clean report as a good sign, not a guarantee.
Every tool got the same test, between October 25, 2026 to October 31, 2026.
| Tool | Score | Accuracy on the labelled set | False positives (flagging something innocent) | False negatives (missing a real case) | Speed per item or per batch | Cost per 1,000 checks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plagium | 3/5 | Correct 40/50 (80.0%) | False positives 3/20 (15.0%) | False negatives 7/30 (23.3%) | 21.7 sec/item | – |
| Quetext | 3/5 | Correct 41/50 (82.0%) | False positives 3/20 (15.0%) | False negatives 6/30 (20.0%) | 25.5 sec/item | – |
| PlagiarismCheck.org | 2.5/5 | Correct 38/50 (76.0%) | False positives 4/20 (20.0%) | False negatives 8/30 (26.7%) | 27.9 sec/item | – |
| SmallSEOTools | 2.5/5 | Correct 38/50 (76.0%) | False positives 4/20 (20.0%) | False negatives 8/30 (26.7%) | 26.6 sec/item | – |
| Copyscape | 2/5 | Correct 37/50 (74.0%) | False positives 4/20 (20.0%) | False negatives 9/30 (30.0%) | 23.7 sec/item | – |
| Scribbr | 2/5 | Correct 36/50 (72.0%) | False positives 4/20 (20.0%) | False negatives 10/30 (33.3%) | 29.9 sec/item | – |
Plagium
Best overallPlagium came first of six with 3 out of 5. It got 40 of our 50 documents right, missed 7 of the 30 with copied text and wrongly flagged 3 of the 20 original ones. At 21.7 seconds per document, it was the quickest in the test. Our full Plagium review has the details.
Plagium offers a Quick search of the live web, news and academic sources, and a Deep search that adds archives and can catch translated matches. It also estimates whether text was written by AI, as a probability rather than a verdict. Pricing is flexible: free users get 2 searches a day of up to 2,000 characters, or 5 with an account, and single documents cost from $2 for 1 to 5 pages. You can also buy credits that never expire, from $7.95 for 25, or take the Unlimited plan at $19.98 a month.
We couldn't find how Plagium handles the text you submit, and it has only 2 reviews on Trustpilot (3.3 out of 5, checked November 2026), one about an unanswered refund request. That's too few to judge it by.
Who it's for
Occasional users who want to pay only for the checks they run, from free daily searches to a single document.
Skip it if
You check a lot of text every month or want the highest accuracy. Quetext got one more document right and missed one fewer copy.
What we liked
- Quickest checker at 21.7 seconds per document
- Wrongly flagged only 3 of 20 originals
- Free daily searches and credits that never expire
What we didn't
- Missed 7 of 30 copied documents
- Free searches capped at 2,000 characters
- No data handling terms we could find
Key features
- Quick search of web, news and academic sources
- Deep search that can catch translated matches
- AI-text detector
- PDF export and share links for reports
- Institutional plan with LMS integration
Plans and prices
| Single document Plagiarism and AI detection; Full report. | Custom contact sales |
| Credit packs | Custom contact sales |
| Unlimited 500 shared checks a month; Texts up to 5,000 characters. | $19.98 a month |
| Institutional 6,000 credits; Unlimited members. | Custom contact sales |
Quetext
Best for regular checkingQuetext came second with 3 out of 5, level with Plagium, and had the highest accuracy score in the test. It got 41 of 50 documents right, missed only 6 of 30 copies and wrongly flagged 3 of 20 originals. It took 25.5 seconds per document. Read our Quetext review for the full test.
Quetext uses its own DeepSearch method to find exact, near and paraphrased matches, and bundles an AI detector, summarizer, humanizer and grammar check in the same plan. Instead of paying per document, you buy a monthly word allowance. The free plan checks up to 1,000 words, Essential is $14.99 a month for 100,000 words, and Professional is $29.98 a month for 200,000 words with unlimited users.
Its privacy policy says your text may be used for AI training unless you opt out by email. Users rate it highly, at 4.6 out of 5 on Trustpilot (154 reviews, checked November 2026), praising how easy it is to use and how quickly support replies.
Who it's for
Writers, students and small teams who check text every month and want plagiarism and AI checks in one subscription.
Skip it if
You need just one check or don't want your text used for AI training. Plagium sells single checks from $2.
What we liked
- Most documents right: 41 of 50
- Missed the fewest copies, 6 of 30
- Free plan checks up to 1,000 words
What we didn't
- Wrongly flagged 3 of 20 originals
- Slower than Plagium at 25.5 seconds
- Text may train AI unless you opt out
Key features
- DeepSearch matching for paraphrased text
- AI detector on every plan
- Bulk upload of 20 or 100 files
- Grammar check and citation tools
- Unlimited users on Professional
Plans and prices
| Essential 100,000 words a month for plagiarism checker and AI detector; Bulk upload of 20 files. | $14.99 a month |
| Professional 200,000 words a month; Bulk upload of 100 files. | $29.98 a month |
PlagiarismCheck.org
Best for teachers and schoolsPlagiarismCheck.org came third with 2.5 out of 5. It got 38 of 50 documents right, missed 8 of 30 copies and wrongly flagged 4 of 20 originals. At 27.9 seconds per document, it was the second slowest. It scored 3 for ease of use and for false positives, and by default it leaves properly cited references out of the score. Our PlagiarismCheck.org review covers it in depth.
Its strength is schools. It works inside seven learning platforms, including Moodle, Canvas, Brightspace and Google Classroom, and has a Google Docs add-on, a Chrome extension and an API. School plans, sold by quote, add an authorship check that compares a writer's style across submissions. It also has an AI checker called TraceGPT.
For individuals, the pricing is unclear. Packs are listed at $5.99, $9.99, $25.49 and $45.49, but the pricing page doesn't say what each includes or whether you pay once or repeatedly. There's a free 2-page check. Users rate it well, at 4.4 out of 5 on Trustpilot (90 reviews, checked November 2026).
Who it's for
Teachers and schools that want plagiarism checks inside the learning platform they already use.
Skip it if
You're an individual who wants clear prices and better detection. Plagium and Quetext scored higher and both have free plans.
What we liked
- Works with seven learning platforms
- Leaves cited references out of the score
- Free 2-page check
What we didn't
- Missed 8 of 30 copied documents
- Wrongly flagged 4 of 20 originals
- Pack contents and billing not explained
Key features
- LMS integrations and Google Docs add-on
- TraceGPT AI checker
- Authorship verification on school plans
- Chrome extension and API
- Grammar checker and citation generator
Plans and prices
| Basic | $5.99 one-time |
| Light | Custom contact sales |
| Standard | Custom contact sales |
| Premium | Custom contact sales |
SmallSEOTools
Best for quick free checksSmallSEOTools came fourth with 2.5 out of 5. Like PlagiarismCheck.org, it got 38 of 50 documents right, missed 8 of 30 copies and wrongly flagged 4 of 20 originals. It took 26.6 seconds per document. Our SmallSEOTools review explains each result.
SmallSEOTools is a website full of free tools, and the plagiarism checker is one of many. Free scans cover up to 1,000 words. Pro Monthly is $9.80 a month, or Pro Yearly works out at $7.84 a month, billed yearly, and Pro raises the limit to 30,000 words per scan and adds a WordPress plugin. Reports show exact and partial matches, and you can leave up to 10 web addresses out of a check.
The site says your text is used only to make the report and stays confidential, but gives no retention period. On Trustpilot it has 2.9 out of 5 from just 15 reviews (checked November 2026), with complaints about tools failing without an error.
Who it's for
Bloggers and freelancers who want a quick, free look at a short text.
Skip it if
You check work that matters, such as client articles or anything published under your name. Plagium and Quetext scored higher and have free plans too.
What we liked
- Free scans of up to 1,000 words
- Pro Monthly is $9.80 a month
- PDF and Word reports
What we didn't
- Missed 8 of 30 copied documents
- Wrongly flagged 4 of 20 originals
- Users report tools failing without an error
Key features
- Exact and partial match detection
- Exclude up to 10 web addresses
- Option to ignore cited text
- WordPress plugin on Pro
Plans and prices
| Pro Monthly 35,000 + 5,000 words; 30k words per scan. | $9.80 a month |
| Pro Yearly 480,000 words; 30k words per scan. | $7.84 a month, billed yearly |
Copyscape
Best for publishers checking web copyCopyscape came fifth with 2 out of 5. It got 37 of 50 documents right, missed 9 of 30 copies and wrongly flagged 4 of 20 originals. It was fairly quick, at 23.7 seconds per document. Our Copyscape review has the full results.
Copyscape is built to find copies of web content on the public web, using Google as its search provider. That suits publishers checking freelance articles and site owners hunting for scraped pages, but it doesn't search academic papers. Premium is prepaid, with no subscription: 3 cents per search of up to 200 words, plus 1 cent for each extra 100 words. It adds Batch Search for up to 10,000 pages, an API and a Private Index for checking against your own content. A free search for web addresses shows up to 10 results.
It has only 6 reviews on Trustpilot, with 2.4 out of 5 (checked November 2026). Copyscape itself warns that its AI detector can be inaccurate.
Who it's for
Publishers, editors and SEO teams who want cheap, pay-as-you-go checks of web content.
Skip it if
You're a student or need reliable detection. Quetext caught more copies in our test, and Scribbr checks academic sources.
What we liked
- Pay per search from 3 cents, no subscription
- Batch Search for up to 10,000 pages
- API and WordPress integration
What we didn't
- Missed 9 of 30 copied documents
- Wrongly flagged 4 of 20 originals
- Searches only the public web
Key features
- Premium search of text, files and web addresses
- Batch Search up to 10,000 pages
- Private Index of your own content
- Copysentry monitoring for new copies
- Free comparison tool for two texts
Plans and prices
| Premium Text and file checks; Batch Search. | Custom contact sales |
Scribbr
Best for a one-off thesis checkScribbr came last of six with 2 out of 5. It got 36 of 50 documents right, missed 10 of 30 copies, the most in our test, and wrongly flagged 4 of 20 originals. At 29.9 seconds per document, it was also the slowest. Our Scribbr review explains why.
Scribbr sells a one-off plagiarism report for students, priced by length with no subscription: $19.95 one-time for up to 7,499 words, $29.95 one-time up to 49,999 words and $39.95 one-time above that. According to third-party descriptions, it compares your text with web pages, academic journals and a store of previously submitted papers, and a paid check also unlocks its AI detector and proofreader.
Scribbr says documents aren't added to any public database, but its help pages and terms give different storage periods, so delete your file after you get the report. It has 4.2 out of 5 on Trustpilot (15,739 reviews, checked November 2026), though that rating covers all of Scribbr's services, not just the checker.
Who it's for
Students who want one check against academic sources before handing in a thesis, and who dislike subscriptions.
Skip it if
You check work more than once or twice. Quetext and Plagium caught more copies in our test and cost less to use regularly.
What we liked
- No subscription to cancel
- Checks against academic sources
- Clear report with a similarity percentage
What we didn't
- Missed the most copies: 10 of 30
- Slowest at 29.9 seconds per document
- From $19.95 one-time per document
Key features
- Similarity report with highlighted matches and sources
- Comparison with academic sources
- AI detector and proofreader with a paid check
- Private storage, not a public database
Plans and prices
| Small document One report. | $19.95 one-time |
| Normal document One report. | $29.95 one-time |
| Large document One report. | $39.95 one-time |
What it costs to get started
Five of the six have a free option, but each is small. Quetext and SmallSEOTools check up to 1,000 words, Plagium gives 2 searches a day of up to 2,000 characters, PlagiarismCheck.org offers one 2-page check and Copyscape searches web addresses only. Scribbr has no free full report.
For paid checks, the cheapest monthly plans are SmallSEOTools Pro Monthly at $9.80 a month, Quetext Essential at $14.99 a month and Plagium Unlimited at $19.98 a month, all billed monthly. If you'd rather pay per use, Copyscape charges 3 cents per search of up to 200 words, Plagium sells single documents from $2 and credit packs from $7.95, and Scribbr charges from $19.95 one-time per document. PlagiarismCheck.org lists packs from $5.99 without saying how they're billed. Scribbr's official pages couldn't be read, so its prices come from third-party listings checked on November 3, 2026.
| Tool | Cheapest way to start | Free plan | Free trial |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plagium | $19.98 a month (Unlimited) | Yes | No |
| Quetext | $14.99 a month (Essential) | Yes | No |
| PlagiarismCheck.org | $5.99 one-time (Basic) | Yes | No |
| SmallSEOTools | $9.80 a month (Pro Monthly) | Yes | No |
| Copyscape | Free | Yes | No |
| Scribbr | $19.95 one-time (Small document) | No | No |
Prices from each tool's own pricing page. Prices can change, so check before you buy.
Also worth knowing about
We didn't test these checkers, but they come up often in other roundups and may suit a specific need.
Turnitin
The checker many universities use, sold only to institutions, so individuals can't buy it. We haven't tested it.
Copyleaks
A checker that roundups praise for covering plagiarism in many languages along with AI-text detection. We haven't tested it.
Originality.ai
A tool that runs plagiarism and AI checks in one scan, which may suit content teams. We haven't tested it.
How we tested
Every checker went through the same test, from October 25 to October 31, 2026. We built a set of 50 documents: 30 contained copied or paraphrased passages and 20 were original. Because we knew the right answer for each one in advance, we could see exactly what each tool caught and what it got wrong. You can read the full set-up in how we test.
We counted how many of the 50 documents each tool judged correctly, how many of the 20 originals it wrongly flagged (false positives) and how many of the 30 copied ones it missed (false negatives). We also timed each check. A false positive can mean accusing someone of copying when they didn't; a false negative means copied work slips through.
Each checker then got a score out of 5, in half points, for accuracy, false-positive rate, speed, ease of use and value for money. Together they make the overall score, and the ranking follows it.
How to choose
If you check now and then, Plagium's free daily searches or single checks from $2 keep costs low. If you check every week, a monthly allowance such as Quetext Essential, at $14.99 a month for 100,000 words, makes more sense.
Copyscape searches only the public web, which suits publishers. Students handing in academic work may prefer Scribbr, which compares against academic sources, even though it scored lower in our test.
PlagiarismCheck.org works inside Moodle, Canvas, Google Classroom and other learning platforms, and school plans add authorship checks. Plagium's Institutional plan also offers LMS integration.
Quetext may use your text for AI training unless you opt out by email. Scribbr stores documents privately for a time, and we couldn't find Plagium's or Copyscape's retention terms. Don't upload confidential work until you're happy with the policy.
Even the best checker in our test missed 6 of 30 copied documents, and every tool flagged at least 3 of 20 originals. If a result matters, run it through a second checker, such as Plagium's free daily search.
Terms you'll see
- Similarity percentage
- The share of your text that matches other sources, shown as a single number in the report.
- False positive
- When a checker flags original writing as copied.
- False negative
- When a checker misses text that really was copied.
- Paraphrase detection
- Spotting copied text that has been reworded rather than pasted word for word.
- AI detector
- A tool that estimates the chance a text was written by AI, as a probability rather than proof.
- LMS
- A learning management system, such as Moodle or Canvas, that schools use to run courses and collect work.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best free plagiarism checker?
Free options are small. Of the checkers we tested, Plagium gives 2 searches a day of up to 2,000 characters, or 5 with an account, and it came first in our test. Quetext and SmallSEOTools check up to 1,000 words, PlagiarismCheck.org offers one 2-page check, and Copyscape's free search takes only web addresses.
How much does a plagiarism checker cost?
It depends on how you pay. Copyscape charges 3 cents per search of up to 200 words, and Plagium sells single documents from $2. SmallSEOTools Pro Monthly is $9.80 a month and Quetext Essential is $14.99 a month. Scribbr charges per document, from $19.95 one-time for up to 7,499 words.
How did we test these plagiarism checkers?
We ran every checker on the same 50 documents in October 2026. Thirty contained copied or paraphrased passages and 20 were original, and we knew the right answer for each in advance. We counted correct results, original documents wrongly flagged, copies missed, and the time each check took.
Can plagiarism checkers detect AI writing?
Most now include an AI detector, including Quetext, Plagium, PlagiarismCheck.org and Copyscape. These detectors give a probability, not proof, and can be wrong. Copyscape itself warns its detector can be inaccurate, so a high AI score shouldn't be used on its own to accuse anyone.
Will my document be stored?
It varies by tool. Quetext's privacy policy says your text may be used for AI training unless you opt out by email. Scribbr says documents aren't added to public databases, but its terms allow private storage for a time. We couldn't find clear storage terms for Plagium or Copyscape.
Can individuals buy Turnitin?
No. Turnitin is sold only to schools and universities, according to recent roundups, so individuals can't buy it directly. Students who want a check against academic sources often use Scribbr instead, though it came last in our test. Quetext and Plagium caught more copies and cost less for regular use.
The bottom line
Start with Plagium's free daily searches for occasional checks, and move to Quetext's monthly plan if you check text every week.
Make your case
Think a tool is missing or wrong?
If you use a tool we reviewed, or work for the company, email us with what you saw. We'll look at the evidence and update the review if it changes our findings.
Think your company belongs on this list?
Send us your product, website and the category it fits. We'll test it the same way as every other tool. It's free, and we can't promise a date or a score.
Update history
- November 4, 2026: published with the results of our test, run between October 25, 2026 to October 31, 2026.
